Part 1: Mean Reversion: Why Markets Don’t Stay Extreme Forever

Mean reversion is one of the most powerful and misunderstood forces in markets. In this three-part series, I will unpack what it is, what the data shows across asset classes, and what this means for portfolio positioning. We begin with a simple premise: Markets do not stay extreme forever.

At a Glance:

  • Mean reversion is the tendency of asset classes to move back toward their long-term average returns after extended periods of strong or weak performance.
  • When markets correct, they often overshoot, much like a pendulum, amplifying volatility and testing investor behaviour.
  • Historical data across public equities, private markets, real estate, infrastructure, and bonds shows a consistent pattern:
  • Periods of exceptional performance are often followed by muted or negative returns.
  • Periods of poor performance tend to create conditions for strong recoveries.

For decades, landing on the cover of Sports Illustrated has marked a turning point for many athletes. Not because of superstition, but because the history is hard to ignore. An internal review of more than 2,400 Sports Illustrated covers found that many featured athletes experienced a noticeable decline in their performance shortly after.

The reason is simple: Athletes earn that spotlight because they are performing at exceptional levels. But extremes rarely last. When performance stretches well beyond what is deemed typical, the forces that created those highs tend to fade, and results often drift back toward more familiar territory.

Markets are no different. Periods of unusually strong returns often cluster near peaks, just as periods of weak performance tend to appear near troughs. Over time, returns have historically tended to move back toward their long-term average. This dynamic is known as mean reversion. It does not predict what will happen next, but it helps explain why markets do not remain at extremes indefinitely. What’s happening in both cases is the same underlying pattern. To understand it more clearly, it helps to start with what we mean by “mean reversion.”

What Do We Mean by Mean Reversion

If you look up the definition of the word mean, you will find several possibilities. It could represent a lack of understanding, as in “I don’t know what you mean,” or convey a level of importance, such as “this means a lot to me”.

In the case of mean reversion, the definition is a mathematical one. “Mean” refers to the average of a series of data points, and “mean reversion” refers to the tendency of asset classes to revert to that mean or average after extended periods of overperformance or underperformance. For the purposes of this discussion, let’s assume five-year periods of over- or under-achievement.

How does this apply to mean reversion? When asset classes correct from new highs and lows, they do not simply return to their average. Much like a pendulum, they are prone to overcompensating on the way back.

This, in turn, tends to exacerbate negative human behaviour, leading to underperformance.

Why Mean Reversion Deserves Attention

We are used to seeing volatility in public markets, particularly in stocks. But it exists in all asset classes to varying degrees. In some cases, the difference in annual returns between one five-year period and the next can reach as high as 30. That is not a typo.

The purpose of this article is twofold. First, to provide a perspective on how mean reversion can impact returns, volatility, and behaviour.

Second, to review our asset allocation model, which we refer to as Core, and show how it is designed to outperform over medium- to long-term periods with much less sensitivity to mean reversion than traditional models. While the theory behind Core is the same as that used by Canada’s largest pension plans, which are considered world-class asset managers known as the Maple 8, it will underperform a traditional 60/40 portfolio from time to time, as it has over for the last two years.

We believe that over reasonable time frames, Core will outperform public balanced models as public asset classes mean revert from their very lofty positions.

Our objective is to help ensure that the journey to achieve and maintain wealth and financial independence does not feel like travelling the road below.

Understanding the Framework

Mean reversion matters because it affects how portfolios behave and how investors experience risk over time. It can make strong periods feel safer than they are, and difficult periods feel more permanent than they tend to be. For investors, the challenge is not identifying when mean reversion will occur, but recognizing how exposure, concentration, and behaviour influence outcomes when it does.

In Part 2, Mean Reversion in the Data: What Markets Have Repeatedly Shown we move from theory to evidence, examining how returns have historically behaved across asset classes following periods of unusually strong or weak performance. The patterns are often surprising, and highly relevant to the environment investors are navigating today.

DISCLAIMER: This material contains the current opinions of the author, and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material is distributed for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal, accounting, tax or specific investment advice. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy, or investment product. All investments contain risk and may gain or lose value. Please speak to your Nicola Wealth advisor for advice based on your unique circumstances. This is not a sales solicitation. This investment is intended for tax residents of Canada who are accredited investors. Residency restrictions apply. Please read the relevant documentation for additional details and important disclosure information, including terms of redemption and limited liquidity. Distribution Yield reflects the annualized fixed distribution rate that the Fund is expected to pay to unitholders, based on the Fund’s most recent declared distribution. Distributions are not guaranteed and may vary in amount and frequency over time. Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of a bond’s price to changes in interest rates. An increase in interest rates is associated with a decrease in bond prices, whereas a decrease in interest rates is linked to an increase in bond prices. The duration for the Nicola High Yield Bond Fund is an estimate based on best available information and is subject to change without notice. Sharpe ratio measures the risk-adjusted return, helping investors understand how much an investment compensates for the risk taken. It is calculated by dividing a fund return less cash (riskless) return by its risk standard deviation. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments contain risk and may gain or lose value. Returns are net of fund expenses charged to date. The Nicola Core Composite returns represent the total Canadian dollar returns of all fee paying portfolios with a Nicola Core mandate. The composite includes clients who are both fully discretionary and nondiscretionary. Historical net of fee composite performance returns are calculated using individual realized time-weighted client returns net of fees and is presented before tax. The Nicola Wealth inclusion policy is based on clients’ weights at calendar month end. The composite returns are asset-weighted based upon ending monthly market value. The Nicola Core mandate may change throughout time. Additional information regarding policies for calculating and reporting returns is available upon request. The composite returns presented represent past performance and is not a reliable indicator of future results, which may vary. Nicola Wealth Management Ltd. (Nicola Wealth) is registered as a Portfolio Manager, Exempt Market Dealer and Investment Fund Manager with the required securities commissions. Morningstar Canadian Neutral Balanced is a proprietary index developed by Morningstar Canada based on the CIFSC Fund categories (www.cifsc.org). This index includes funds which meet the following criteria: Funds in the Canadian Neutral Balanced category must invest at least 70% of total assets in a combination of equity securities domiciled in Canada and Canadian dollar denominated fixed income securities and between 40% and 60% of their total assets in equity securities. Comparisons of the historical performance of Nicola Wealth funds or models to the historical performance of indexes, mutual funds or other investment vehicles should only be undertaken with consideration of the differences that exist between the underlying investments that comprise the compared investment vehicles. Indexes may be primarily composed of a single asset type/asset class (i.e. 100% equities or 100% bonds) whereas Nicola Wealth funds may or may not contain a combination of exchange-traded equities, marketable bonds, private investments, other alternative investment classes and exempt products. When making any comparison of historical performance, these differences and their impact on the performance of each comparable should be taken into account. Nicola Wealth Management Ltd. (Nicola Wealth) is registered as a Portfolio Manager, Exempt Market Dealer and Investment Fund Manager with the required securities commissions.